Below are my 3 final submissions for my editing tasks, with a general idea of my thought process throughout.
Note: For process of the work, please see previous blog posts!
Fairly Legal-
For this task, my main improvement came in learning about continuity. When I first started it, I focused more on shots, without concentration on whether the content was continuous. An example of this came in places such as her folder, which, before I started focusing on continuity, would be open in one shot then suddenly closed in the other. Another thing that I think I have gained a better idea of is the idea of information. We were told a lot that if a shot doesn’t hold any new information, there is no need to change it, so through my process of continuously fixing it up, I focused a lot on making sure that each cut was done for a reason and not randomly. I am pleased with the result, as the continuity and information of the edit has improved a lot throughout, and I worked on the sound to make sure that it was kept at a continuous quality throughout.
The focus of this edit, to me, was portraying the emotions that each of the characters were feeling, cutting to the necessary shots in order to convey them. If there was no need to change shot, I didn’t, as I wanted to build up momentum and not just cut as often as possible.
Delicious Peace-
In this task, my improvement came through mostly in my use of cuts. As well as focusing on continuity in audio, I wanted to use the audio in order to portray relationships between scenes. I played a lot with the placement of the audio in this task, making sure that the audio did not place focus on the changing of shots. The angle that I took for this task was a documentary including a voice over narration with interviews thrown in- in which I chose to incorporate J shaped edits. For this task, I am pleased with the outcome as I feel a lot more proficient with the way that I handled the shots and the audio itself and worked hard on making sure that the shots used complimented the audio, and that one did not outweigh the other. When working on the audio, I learnt a lot of things on premier pro such as working on key framing in the tool bin, and using things such as constant gain so that it all flowed well. When I first started working on it, I had some issues with the flow, where the scene or audio seemed distracting and one over took the other, so I was very happy that I managed to find my rhythm in editing through working on this task!
Creative Edit-
When working on my creative piece, I was very interested in the idea of intellectual montage previously discussed in class such as the idea of the Rocky montage we were shown in which the cuts, so obviously different, were linked. I wanted to do something a bit different and have the opportunity to experiment with montage for my editing module. As well as doing that, I also chose to try and combine the idea of symbolism and parallelism with it and show an ambiguous relationship between the battle and the woman shown in my piece. I liked the idea of linking them both, when they were so obviously from different time periods. The way I combined these was through parallelism, in which I tried to match the cuts so that they seemed link. Some examples include in the beginning, when the wing turns, it cuts to her arm moving in the same location, and later on, when there is a canon pointing upwards, she looks upwards. Some inspiration for linking scenes in such a way came from Satoshi Kon and some of his works including ‘Paprika’ in which the idea of parallelism is incorporated in a way which I found very interesting.
A lot of changes were done as I worked on this. I played with the idea of enforcing the symbolism and montage by having a person writing, indicating that both scenes were linked with his memory, as he spoke out what he was saying. The main problem with this was that he spoke a lot more than he wrote, which made the story less believable in terms of continuity and flow. It was because of this that I made the decision to remove the talking and the writing outright, where I then proceeded to edit around the shots, including more parallelism, and done them in a way so that the story, through visuals and cuts alone, would have highs and lows.
Once doing this, I had to think about audio, I had previously played with adding a song, which made the whole thing seem too dramatic, and the audio that I had of writing would not be relevant anymore as I had removed the talking and writing scenes.
I played around with different audio for talking and music, but all of them seemed to direct too much attention. I wanted the story to speak for itself, and let the symbolism and cuts tell a different story to whomever was watching it. When I tried adding different types of audio, each seemed to direct the story in a certain way too much. Without the audio, when I gave it to other people to watch, each person that watched it came out with a different interpretation of what the story was, ranging from a mentally disturbed girl, to war, all the way to star crossed lovers. I loved the idea of letting people come up with their own ideas in this way, but on the other hand, I did not want people getting distracted by the lack of audio, since as people we are used to being constantly surrounded by audio. with this in mind, I looked into finding atmospheric music instead of an actual song or lyrical/instrumental piece (As can be seen in previous blog posts with tests).
With this in mind, after a few combinations, I chose to use some atmospheric music found online (YouTube) which I felt was not distracting, but acted as an under layer to the story. Although I feel this in itself was a risk in terms of it possibly being too directive to the audience, I did not want to have no audio and distract from the story. With my creative piece having only a low slightly dramatic atmospheric sound to it, I feel it allows viewers to focus on the connection between the alternating scenes and come to their own conclusion as to what is happening.
The type of atmospheric music that I chose to use is a bit dramatic, as stated above, but I edited in a way so that it is low in the background, there to keep the viewers attention trained on the video at hand, by making them feel something. This could be apprehension all the way to feeling sad, but I wanted them to be able to connect the audio to the video, making their own connection between them. I am pleased with the music found, and when edited it, I also tried to pay attention to the highs and lows in the footage, so that it would compliment it and work together with it, not against it.
I am happy that I chose to emit the talking and writing, as well as the distractions of lyrical/instrumental music and use atmospheric sound, as my main focus for this edit was the idea of intellectual montage combined with symbolism and parallelism. I think that the story arc is effective with that kind of atmosphere running in the background.
In this case, the main focus of my creative piece is in the cuts and the footage itself. The audio acts as a secondary thing, which is there in the background without being the main focus.
Note: The footage for this edit task was found by searching ‘Raw Footage’ with the downloadable option into Vimeo. The audio was found from YouTube under Atmospheric sounds.
I am happy, overall, with the outcome of all my edits. I tried to challenge myself throughout this module and use different methods and techniques discussed in class. Through continuity all the way to montage, I tried doing something different according to what I had learnt throughout each task, and am pleased with the results. I feel a lot more confident, not only in my use of premier pro and its features, but also in recognising when certain shots need to be used and when it isn’t necessary to change them, and how to direct the flow of a story.